human aspc1 Search Results


human pancreatic cancer cell lines  (ATCC)
96
ATCC human pancreatic cancer cell lines
Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human pancreatic cancer cell lines/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pancreatic cancer cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tumor cell lines  (AMS Biotechnology)
96
AMS Biotechnology tumor cell lines
Tumor Cell Lines, supplied by AMS Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tumor cell lines/product/AMS Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tumor cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
human aspc1 luciferase stable cells  (GenTarget)
93
GenTarget human aspc1 luciferase stable cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Human Aspc1 Luciferase Stable Cells, supplied by GenTarget, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human aspc1 luciferase stable cells/product/GenTarget
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human aspc1 luciferase stable cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mda-468 human idc cell line  (Dainihon Jochugiku Co)
90
Dainihon Jochugiku Co mda-468 human idc cell line
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Mda 468 Human Idc Cell Line, supplied by Dainihon Jochugiku Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mda-468 human idc cell line/product/Dainihon Jochugiku Co
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mda-468 human idc cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
aspc-1 human pancreatic carcinoma cells  (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures)
90
European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures aspc-1 human pancreatic carcinoma cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1 Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells, supplied by European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aspc-1 human pancreatic carcinoma cells/product/European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 human pancreatic carcinoma cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
aspc-1  (Genetica Inc)
90
Genetica Inc aspc-1
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1, supplied by Genetica Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aspc-1/product/Genetica Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
aspc-1 cells (human pancreatic tumor cell line) transformed with a gfp plasmid  (Changyi Aoxin Chemical Co Ltd)
90
Changyi Aoxin Chemical Co Ltd aspc-1 cells (human pancreatic tumor cell line) transformed with a gfp plasmid
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1 Cells (Human Pancreatic Tumor Cell Line) Transformed With A Gfp Plasmid, supplied by Changyi Aoxin Chemical Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aspc-1 cells (human pancreatic tumor cell line) transformed with a gfp plasmid/product/Changyi Aoxin Chemical Co Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 cells (human pancreatic tumor cell line) transformed with a gfp plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line aspc1  (Cosmo Bio USA)
90
Cosmo Bio USA human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line aspc1
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cell Line Aspc1, supplied by Cosmo Bio USA, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line aspc1/product/Cosmo Bio USA
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line aspc1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
human pancreatic tumour aspc-1 cells  (LGC Promochem)
90
LGC Promochem human pancreatic tumour aspc-1 cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Human Pancreatic Tumour Aspc 1 Cells, supplied by LGC Promochem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human pancreatic tumour aspc-1 cells/product/LGC Promochem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pancreatic tumour aspc-1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 AsPC1, and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).

Journal: Cancers

Article Title: Externally Applied Electromagnetic Fields and Hyperthermia Irreversibly Damage Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/cancers15133413

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 AsPC1, and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).

Article Snippet: Human AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells were obtained from GenTarget Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Control, Cell Culture

Effect of EMFs and HT on ROS generation and the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis.

Journal: Cancers

Article Title: Externally Applied Electromagnetic Fields and Hyperthermia Irreversibly Damage Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/cancers15133413

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of EMFs and HT on ROS generation and the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis.

Article Snippet: Human AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells were obtained from GenTarget Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques:

Effect of EMFs + HIFU-induced HT, gemcitabine and/or PT on the growth of AsPC1 pancreas carcinoma. Cancer cells were inoculated subcutaneously on day 0, and mice were treated with EMFs and HIFU as described under Materials and Methods. ( A ) EMFs and HIFU were applied once per day per three consecutive days (Monday to Wednesday) for two consecutive weeks starting on day 14 after tumor inoculation. Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) was administered twice on days 14 and 21. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups at each time point. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 15 mice per experimental group). ( B ) A disodium salt of PT phosphate (Chromadex Inc. Los Angeles CA) (100 mg of PT/kg) was administered i.p. (one dose 30 min before starting each irradiation session with EMFs and HT). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 12 mice per experimental group). ( C ) Representative images of mice inoculated with AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells and treated with EMFs HT and gemcitabine (GEM) or EMFs HT gemcitabine and PT.

Journal: Cancers

Article Title: Externally Applied Electromagnetic Fields and Hyperthermia Irreversibly Damage Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/cancers15133413

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of EMFs + HIFU-induced HT, gemcitabine and/or PT on the growth of AsPC1 pancreas carcinoma. Cancer cells were inoculated subcutaneously on day 0, and mice were treated with EMFs and HIFU as described under Materials and Methods. ( A ) EMFs and HIFU were applied once per day per three consecutive days (Monday to Wednesday) for two consecutive weeks starting on day 14 after tumor inoculation. Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) was administered twice on days 14 and 21. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups at each time point. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 15 mice per experimental group). ( B ) A disodium salt of PT phosphate (Chromadex Inc. Los Angeles CA) (100 mg of PT/kg) was administered i.p. (one dose 30 min before starting each irradiation session with EMFs and HT). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 12 mice per experimental group). ( C ) Representative images of mice inoculated with AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells and treated with EMFs HT and gemcitabine (GEM) or EMFs HT gemcitabine and PT.

Article Snippet: Human AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells were obtained from GenTarget Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Irradiation, Luciferase